โœฆ
Knowledge Hub session log
operations / projects/knowledge-hub/session-log.md

Knowledge Hub session log

Properties
Type
project-doc
Status
active
Curation state
canonical
Created
2026-04-08T02:33:54Z
Updated
2026-04-08T03:20:40Z
ID
project-knowledge-hub-session-log-001
Source agents
pi
Summary
Rolling log of major Knowledge Hub development and operating sessions.
operations / projects/knowledge-hub/session-log.md

Knowledge Hub session log

2026-04-08 โ€” pi-teams prompting system and cheap-executor experiments

Outcomes

  • Added project-local pi-teams prompt modes: frontier-open, mixed-guided, budget-scaffolded
  • Added project-local agent definitions and prompting skill for Knowledge Hub
  • Ran a mixed-guided tags-related team experiment
  • Found and fixed a real backend integration gap in tag-filtered home navigation
  • Ran a cheaper-executor experiment using explicit openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini
  • Completed and reviewed the home-page cross-vault quick switcher slice
  • Committed and pushed repo changes
  • Stored durable playbooks and lessons in Knowledge Hub

Repo changes

  • 6d8825d Improve tag-filtered search and cross-vault quick switcher
  • f11997e Add Knowledge Hub team prompting playbooks

Knowledge captured

  • playbooks/pi-team-lead-playbook.md
  • playbooks/cheap-executor-decision-checklist.md
  • lessons/pi-teams-prompting-and-cheap-executor-lessons.md
  • raw capture in inbox/2026/04/08/knowledge-hub-session-pi-teams-prompt-modes-and-cheap-executor-experiment.md

Key lessons

  • Outcome-first prompting plus justified constraints was sufficient.
  • Repo audits should happen before assigning roadmap slices.
  • Cheap executors work well for bounded, visible, low-risk slices with strong review.
  • Use provider-qualified model IDs for smaller-model experiments.

2026-04-08 โ€” simplification decision

Decision

  • Do not restart in a fresh repo.
  • Reframe Knowledge Hub around the simpler core idea: a shared, web-accessible, markdown-first wiki for humans and agents.

Why

  • The foundation is already right: markdown on disk, git history, remote HTTP access, and durable wiki pages.
  • The main complexity problem is in workflow framing, not the substrate.

Artifact

  • projects/knowledge-hub/simplification-plan.md

Next step

  • Use a team to execute the simplification plan as a sequence of bounded changes instead of attempting a rewrite.

2026-04-08 โ€” simplification wave 1 landed

Outcome

  • Accepted and landed Wave 1 of the simplification plan.
  • This wave stayed intentionally bounded: docs/skills reframing plus small UI copy updates.
  • No backend rewrite, endpoint churn, or storage changes were introduced.

Files / surfaces updated

  • docs/implementation-stack.md
  • docs/live-deployment.md
  • skills/knowledge-hub/SKILL.md
  • skills/knowledge-hub/project-context-template.md
  • server UI copy in base.html, home.html, vault.html, document.html, new_document.html
  • test expectation updates in server/tests/test_capture_and_ui.py

Validation

  • cd server && uv run --extra dev pytest -q
  • Result: 28 passed

Commit

  • 2bd61f8 Simplify docs and UI framing around the wiki-first model

Takeaway

  • The right move was a framing reset, not a rewrite.
  • The repo can be simplified by changing defaults, explanations, and copy while keeping advanced helpers available as optional tools.

2026-04-08 โ€” live smoke test after simplification wave

Outcome

  • Ran a live smoke test against https://kb.icvida.com focused on the simplified core workflow.
  • Core workflow passed: search, capture, read, append, history, durable doc create/read/search/delete, activity, and tags.
  • Live timings were roughly 316โ€“420 ms end-to-end for reads/searches and ~379โ€“418 ms for writes.

Artifact

  • projects/knowledge-hub/live-smoke-test-2026-04-08.md

Interpretation

  • The simplified workflow is usable right now.
  • Search is useful but still exact-oriented.
  • No rewrite is indicated; future changes should remain incremental.